44 Cal. 4th 960, 189 P.3d 271, 81 Cal. Rptr. 3d 265, 45 Cal. 4th 76a modification
Filed 10/1/08
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
VARDUI ROSE BARSAMYAN,
Petitioner,
S148712
v.
Ct.App. 2/7 B188695
APPELLATE DIVISION OF
THE SUPERIOR COURT
Los Angeles County
OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
Super. Ct. No. BS099858
)
Respondent;
THE PEOPLE,
Real Party in Interest.
MODIFICATION OF OPINION
THE COURT:
The opinion filed August 7, 2008, and published at 44 Cal.4th 960, is modified
in the following respect:
On page 966, the first sentence of the first paragraph is modified to read as
follows: ?As we shall explain, we agree with the trial court and the majority in the
Court of Appeal that when appointed defense counsel appears for trial in two matters,
and the calendar court selects or requires counsel to select a single matter for trial and
sends that matter to a trial department for trial, counsel necessarily consents to
continuance of the remaining matter.?
This modification does not affect the judgment.
1