1940

California W. S. L. Ins. Co. v. Pacific etc. Co. Ltd. , 15 Cal.2d 763 (1940)

California W. S. L. Ins. Co. v. Pacific etc. Co. Ltd. , 15 Cal.2d 763

[S. F. No. 16026. In Bank. January 22, 1940.]

CALIFORNIA WESTERN STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent, v. PACIFIC AMERICAN COMPANY, LTD. (a Corporation), Appellant.

COUNSEL

Chickering & Gregory, Stephen R. Duhring, Bauer, MacDonald, Schultheis & Pettit, MacDonald, Schultheis & Pettit and Fred E. Pettit, Jr., for Appellant.

Williamson & Wallace, Ingebretson, Ray, Rawlins & Christensen, Ware & Ware, Downey, Brand & Seymour, Stephen W. Downey, James D. Adams, McCutchen, Olney, Mannon & Greene for Respondent.

Neil Cunningham and George H. Downer, as Amici Curiae, on Behalf of Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

CARTER, J.

This is a companion case to American Trust Co. v. California Western States Life Insurance Co., S. F. No. 15797 (ante, p. 42 [98 PaCal.2d 497]), and California Western States Life Insurance Co. v. Tucker, S. F. No. 16027 (ante, p. 69 [98 PaCal.2d 511]), this day decided. The factual background and legal issues involved in the instant case have been fully discussed in the opinions in the foregoing cases, and are therefore not repeated here. [15 Cal.2d 764] [1] The appellants in these cases have called to our attention the case of Gallagher v. Pacific American Co., 97 Fed.2d 193, in which a stockholder of California-Western brought a representative suit against defendant herein to recover the share of the commission which it had received from Tucker, Hunter, Dulin & Co. The complaint was dismissed for failure to state a cause of action. We are not concerned in the three present cases with the validity of the commission agreement or the right of those stockholders who received portions of the commission to retain the money. Consequently the Gallagher case is not relevant here.

For the reasons stated in the above-mentioned opinions, the judgment of the trial court herein is affirmed.

Gibson, J., Shenk, J., Curtis, J., Goodell, J., pro tem., Edmonds, J., and Waste, C.J., concurred.

Anony mous

Share
Published by
Anony mous

Recent Posts

Motion to Compel Deposition (Judge William A. Crowfoot)

Case Number: 24NNCV02807    Hearing Date: November 18, 2025    Dept: 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY…

2 weeks ago

Motion to Tax Costs (Judge William A. Crowfoot)

Case Number: 23AHCV01903    Hearing Date: November 18, 2025    Dept: 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY…

2 weeks ago

Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses (William A. Crowfoot)

Case Number: 23AHCV01295    Hearing Date: November 18, 2025    Dept: 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY…

2 weeks ago

Motion to Bifurcate (William A. Crowfoot)

Case Number: 23AHCV01193    Hearing Date: November 18, 2025    Dept: 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY…

2 weeks ago

BARBACCIA v. GBR MAGIC SANDS MHP, LLC, No. B322596 (Cal. App. Dec. 16, 2022) *NOT PUBLISHED*

LOUIS P. BARBACCIA, SR., as Trustee, etc. et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. GBR MAGIC…

3 weeks ago

ANAHEIM MOBILE ESTATES, LLC v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 113 Cal.App.5th 602 (2025)

Filed 7/17/25; Certified for Publication 8/13/25 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE…

1 month ago