Categories: 1979

California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency v. Public Utilities Com. , 25 Cal.3d 540

California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency v. Public Utilities Com. , 25 Cal.3d 540

[S.F. No. 23897. Supreme Court of California. October 24, 1979.]

CALIFORNIA TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, Respondent; PACIFIC SOUTHWEST AIRLINES et al., Real Parties in Interest

(Opinion by The Court.)

COUNSEL

Evelle J. Younger, George Deukmejian, Attorneys General, R. H. Connett and E. Clement Shute, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, and E. Robert Wright, Deputy Attorney General, for Petitioner.

Sanford Sagalkin, Acting Assistant United States Attorney General, Charles E. Biblowit, Joshua I. Schwartz, Paul Kaplow and Judith W. Wegner as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.

Janice E. Kerr, Hector Anninos and Scott K. Carter for Respondent.

Robert Barnett and Brownell Merrell, Jr., for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

THE COURT.

[1] We granted a petition to review Public Utilities Commission decision No. 88249 which granted certificates of public convenience and necessity to real parties in interest for passenger air service to the Tahoe Valley Airport. The case presented two issues: the asserted concurrent jurisdiction of the California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency over passenger air service into the Tahoe Basin and the asserted inadequacy of the environmental impact report.

Subsequent to our grant of a writ of review, Pacific Southwest Airlines has ceased passenger service to the Tahoe Valley Airport. The Public Utilities Commission informs us that Air California will discontinue passenger service on or before November 8, 1979. The commission suggests that the present matter may become moot as of that date. [25 Cal.3d 542]

On the papers before us we are uncertain whether the airlines have in fact abandoned, or intend to abandon, any intention to provide passenger air service under the certificates issued in this case. That question, we believe, should be resolved by the commission before undertaking further proceedings in this matter.

This cause is remanded to the Public Utilities Commission to determine whether the applications of real parties in interest for certificates of public convenience and necessity for passenger air service to Tahoe Valley Airport are moot, or will become moot on or about November 8, 1979.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

Motion to Compel Deposition (Judge William A. Crowfoot)

Case Number: 24NNCV02807    Hearing Date: November 18, 2025    Dept: 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY…

2 weeks ago

Motion to Tax Costs (Judge William A. Crowfoot)

Case Number: 23AHCV01903    Hearing Date: November 18, 2025    Dept: 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY…

2 weeks ago

Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses (William A. Crowfoot)

Case Number: 23AHCV01295    Hearing Date: November 18, 2025    Dept: 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY…

2 weeks ago

Motion to Bifurcate (William A. Crowfoot)

Case Number: 23AHCV01193    Hearing Date: November 18, 2025    Dept: 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY…

2 weeks ago

BARBACCIA v. GBR MAGIC SANDS MHP, LLC, No. B322596 (Cal. App. Dec. 16, 2022) *NOT PUBLISHED*

LOUIS P. BARBACCIA, SR., as Trustee, etc. et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. GBR MAGIC…

3 weeks ago

ANAHEIM MOBILE ESTATES, LLC v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 113 Cal.App.5th 602 (2025)

Filed 7/17/25; Certified for Publication 8/13/25 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE…

1 month ago