248 Cal.App.4th 542c
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
ADRIAN ANTWON MONTGOMERY, Defendant and Appellant.
G051812
California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Third Division
June 8, 2016
?????????THE COURT.?

On the court’s own motion, it is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 8, 2016 (247 Cal.App.4th 1385;___Cal.Rptr.3d___), be modified in the following particulars:

1. On page 4 of the slip opinion, line 3 [247 Cal.App.4th 1388, advance report, last full par., lines 12-13], delete the following sentences:

“Section 667 in turn refers to section 667.5, which classifies “attempted murder” as a “violent felony.” (? 667.5, subd. (c)(12).)”

Replace with the following sentences:

“Section 667, subdivision (e)(2)(C)(iv), includes “[a]ny homicide offense, including any attempted homicide offense….” (? 667, subd. (e)(2)(C)(iv)(IV)) as being among the disqualifying convictions.”

2. On page 5 of the slip opinion, last line of the top partial paragraph [247 Cal.App.4th 1389, advance report, 2d full par., lines 10-11], remove the following:

(See People v. Florez (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 1176, 1190-1191 [200 Cal.Rptr.3d 419].) and replace with the following:

“In construing statutes adopted by the voters, we apply the same principles of interpretation we apply to statutes enacted by the Legislature.” (Id. at p. 682.) “?When the language is ambiguous, “we refer to other indicia of the voters’ intent, particularly the analyses and arguments contained in the official ballot pamphlet.” [Citation.]’ [Citation.]” (Robert L. v. Superior Court (2003) 30 Cal.4th 894, 901 [135 Cal.Rptr.2d 30, 69 P.3d 951].)

This modification does not effect a change in the judgment.