Categories: 1936

People v. Stone, 6 Cal.2d 62

People v. Stone, 6 Cal.2d 62

[Crim. No. 3986. In Bank. April 2, 1936.]

THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ELTON M. STONE, Appellant.

COUNSEL

Arthur C. Shepard, Edward L. Kellas and A. W. Carlson for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Dan F. Conway, District Attorney, for Respondent.

OPINION

THOMPSON, J.

The defendant was indicted for murder. At the time of arraignment, it appeared that he had not secured counsel. The court explained to him the charge and the possible penalty therefor and, upon defendant’s request, appointed counsel. After arraignment, ample opportunity was extended defendant for consultation with the two lawyers appointed by the court, before he was required to enter his plea. He pleaded guilty to the charge and the court took evidence for the purpose of ascertaining whether there were any facts which would justify the court in imposing a life sentence instead of the extreme penalty. The trial judge concluded that there were no such facts and sentenced defendant to be hanged.

The appeal is here because, in 1935, the legislature amended section 1239 of the Penal Code by inserting the following sentence:

“When judgment of death is rendered, upon any plea, an appeal is automatically taken without any action by the defendant or his attorney.”

[1] At the time set for the oral argument on this appeal, both of the attorneys for defendant appeared and stated that in their opinion there was no ground upon which a reversal could be based and that in truth, the entire proceeding was fair and in conformity with the law. We deem it unnecessary, under the circumstances, to detail the evidence. Suffice it to say that we have read the testimony, including a full and apparently complete confession by the defendant. It demonstrates beyond question that defendant is guilty of a deliberate and premeditated killing of a high school girl in Fresno, under peculiarly aggravated circumstances. It follows that the judgment should be and it is hereby affirmed.

Waste, C.J., Langdon, J., Conrey, J., Curtis, J., Seawell, J., and Shenk, J., concurred.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 6 Cal.2d 62

Recent Posts

Motion to Compel Deposition (Judge William A. Crowfoot)

Case Number: 24NNCV02807    Hearing Date: November 18, 2025    Dept: 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY…

2 days ago

Motion to Tax Costs (Judge William A. Crowfoot)

Case Number: 23AHCV01903    Hearing Date: November 18, 2025    Dept: 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY…

2 days ago

Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses (William A. Crowfoot)

Case Number: 23AHCV01295    Hearing Date: November 18, 2025    Dept: 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY…

2 days ago

Motion to Bifurcate (William A. Crowfoot)

Case Number: 23AHCV01193    Hearing Date: November 18, 2025    Dept: 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY…

2 days ago

BARBACCIA v. GBR MAGIC SANDS MHP, LLC, No. B322596 (Cal. App. Dec. 16, 2022) *NOT PUBLISHED*

LOUIS P. BARBACCIA, SR., as Trustee, etc. et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. GBR MAGIC…

1 week ago

ANAHEIM MOBILE ESTATES, LLC v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 113 Cal.App.5th 602 (2025)

Filed 7/17/25; Certified for Publication 8/13/25 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE…

4 weeks ago