SCHILLER v. CITY OF GLENDALE, 208 Cal. 789 (1929)

282 P. 798

C.G. SCHILLER et al., Appellants, v. THE CITY OF GLENDALE (a Municipal Corporation) et al., Respondents.

Docket No. L.A. 10099.Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
December 5, 1929.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Ruben S. Schmidt, Judge. Affirmed.

Chas. S. Conner for Appellants.

W. Turney Fox, City Attorney, Bernard Brennan, Deputy City Attorney, Ray L. Morrow, City Attorney, and Frank M. Moody, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondents City of Glendale and Ruth Kerns.

Arthur M. Ellis for Respondent E.L. Fleming.

THE COURT.

[1] This cause refers to the same street improvement proceedings and is in every respect, both as to the facts and as to the law involved, identical with and controlled by case No. 10085, Woodill v. City of Glendale, ante, p. 564 [282 P. 797], this day decided. Upon authority of that case, for all the reasons set forth therein and upon the same grounds, the judgment herein, which passed for defendants upon the sustaining of their demurrers, without leave to amend, is hereby affirmed.

Page 790