PLAINTIFF CITY OF SANTA ANA MOTION FOR ORDER FOR PREJUDGMENT POSSESSION
The Court is inclined to?grant?Plaintiff?s motion for prejudgment possession.? However, the date of possession may depend, in part, upon whether the June 30, 2018 deadline has been extended.
Defendant Carrillo acknowledges that the City will obtain possession of the property.? Her opposition merely requests additional time.? Plaintiff claims that it needs immediate possession based on a funding deadline of June 30, 2018.? However, the City also states that it had requested an extension to that deadline.??Gabriel Sept. 19, 2017 Dec., ??8.? No information has been provided to the Court regarding whether the requested extension has been granted and, if so, to what date.? The implication from the City?s most recent filing on January 11, 2018 is that no extension has been granted but this is unclear. This information may impact the specific date of possession.
Counsel for the City should be prepared to discuss at the hearing whether the deadline has been extended and, if so, to what date, and why possession is needed several months before the June 2018 deadline if that is still the deadline.