Sachse v. Craemer, 11 Cal.2d 779
[L. A. No. 16582. In Bank. June 10, 1938.]
RICHARD SACHSE, Petitioner, v. JUSTUS F. CRAEMER, as Building and Loan Commissioner, etc., Respondent.
COUNSEL
John C. Campbell and Franz R. Sachse for Petitioner.
Clock, McWhinney & Clock and James C. Ingebretsen for Respondent.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum
THE COURT.
This is a companion case to the case of The Ventura Co., Inc., v. Craemer, this day decided (ante, p. 407 [80 PaCal.2d 720]). [1] On the authority of that decision and for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed therein the petitioner herein is entitled to the writ of mandamus.
Let the peremptory writ issue.
Opinion Information
| Date: | Citation: | Category: | Status: |
| Fri, 06/10/1938 | 11 Cal.2d 779 | Review – Civil Appeal | Opinion issued |
Parties
| 1 | RICHARD SACHSE, Petitioner, v. JUSTUS F. CRAEMER, as Building and Loan Commissioner, etc. (Respondent) |
| 2 | RICHARD SACHSE (Petitioner) |
| 3 | JUSTUS F. CRAEMER, as Building and Loan Commissioner, etc. (Respondent) |
| Disposition | |
| Jun 10 1938 | Writ Issued |