Category: 1968

In re Anderson , 69 Cal.2d 613 [Crim. No. 11572. In Bank. Nov. 18, 1968.] In re ROBERT PAGE ANDERSON on Habeas Corpus. [Crim. No. 11573. In Bank. Nov. 18, 1968.] In re FREDERICK SATERFIELD on Habeas Corpus. (Two Cases.) COUNSEL Marshall W. Krause, Richard Bancroft, Garfield Stewart, Jack Greenberg, Leroy D. Clark, Charles S. […]

Atlantic Oil Co. v. County of Los Angeles , 69 Cal.2d 585 [L. A. No. 29534. In Bank. Nov. 18, 1968.] ATLANTIC OIL COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, Defendant […]

Chambers v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. , 69 Cal.2d 556 [L. A. No. 29570. In Bank. Nov. 14, 1968.] CLEO CHAMBERS, Petitioner, v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, LONG BEACH IRON COMPANY et al., Respondents. COUNSEL Richard J. Cantrell and Levy, DeRoy, Geffner & Van Bourg for Petitioner. Everett A. Corten, Edward A. Sarkisian, Nathan Mudge, […]

In re Giannini , 69 Cal.2d 563

People v. Hill , 69 Cal.2d 550 [Crim. No. 12275. In Bank. Nov. 13, 1968.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ARCHIE WILLIAM HILL, JR., Defendant and Appellant. COUNSEL Joseph Amato, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, Elizabeth Miller and […]

People ex rel. S. F. Bay etc. Com. v. Town of Emeryville , 69 Cal.2d 533 [S. F. No. 22591. In Bank. Nov. 13, 1968.] THE PEOPLE ex rel. SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TOWN OF EMERYVILLE, Defendant and Respondent. COUNSEL Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Clayton P. Roche, […]

Delta Dynamics, Inc. v. Arioto , 69 Cal.2d 525 [Sac. No. 7822. In Bank. Nov. 13, 1968.] DELTA DYNAMICS, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EDWIN ARIOTO et al., Defendants and Appellants. COUNSEL Charles A. Zeller and Francis X. Vieira for Defendants and Appellants. Maxwell M. Freeman and Roger H. Bernhardt for Plaintiff and Respondent. OPINION […]

In re Mugica , 69 Cal.2d 516 [Crim. No. 12205. In Bank. Nov. 8, 1968.] In re RICHARD MENDOZA MUGICA on Habeas Corpus. COUNSEL Richard Mendoza Mugica, in pro. per., and Marshall M. Schulman, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Petitioner. [69 Cal.2d 518] Cecil Hicks, District Attorney, and Michael R. Capizzi, Deputy District […]

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd. , 69 Cal.2d 506 [L. A. No. 29184. In Bank. Nov. 4, 1968.] McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Respondent. COUNSEL Forster, Gemmill & Farmer, James H. Knecht, Jr., Louis Lieber, Jr., and M. B. Hunt for Plaintiff and Appellant. Thomas C. […]

People v. Superior Court , 69 Cal.2d 491 [S. F. No. 22592. In Bank. Oct. 31, 1968.] THE PEOPLE, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MARIN COUNTY, Respondent; LOVERD HOWARD, Real Party in Interest. COUNSEL Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Edward P. O’Brien and Derald E. Granberg, Deputy […]

In re Harris , 69 Cal.2d 486 [Crim. No. 12308. In Bank. Oct. 30, 1968.] In re HENDERSON HARRIS on Habeas Corpus. COUNSEL Jane R. Brady for Petitioner. John D. Maharg, County Counsel, and Jean Louise Webster, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondent. Agnew, Miller, Carlson & Powers and Maynard J. Klein for Real Party in […]

Dillenbeck v. City of Los Angeles , 69 Cal.2d 472 [L. A. No. 29544. In Bank. Oct. 28, 1968.] MARGARET H. DILLENBECK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents. COUNSEL Getz, Aikens & Manning and George E. Leaver for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Bourke […]

Templeton Feed & Grain v. Ralston Purina Co. , 69 Cal.2d 461 [L. A. Nos. 29520, 29521. In Bank. Oct. 25, 1968.] TEMPLETON FEED AND GRAIN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RALSTON PURINA COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant. COUNSEL Irmas & Rutter and William A. Rutter for Plaintiff and Appellant. Spray, Gould & Bowers, John J. Costanzo, […]

Woodcock v. Fontana Scaffolding & Equip. Co. , 69 Cal.2d 452 [S. F. No. 22605. In Bank. Oct. 24, 1968.] WALDO E. WOODCOCK, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FONTANA SCAFFOLDING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant; ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, Intervener and Respondent. COUNSEL Ellwood Hoskins and Cyril Viadro for Defendant and Appellant. Boccardo, Blum, Lull, Niland, […]

Clark v. Dziabas , 69 Cal.2d 449 [L. A. No. 29569. In Bank. Oct. 7, 1968.] HERBERT LEE CLARK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BODO DZIABAS, Defendant and Respondent. COUNSEL N. E. Youngblood and Samuel Schekman for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Edward I. Pollock, Robert E. Cartwright, Theodore A. Horn, Robert G. Beloud, Leo M. […]

Maloney v. Rath , 69 Cal.2d 442 Opinion Information Date:Citation:Category:Status: Mon, 10/07/196869 Cal.2d 442Review – Civil AppealOpinion issued Parties 1KATHLEEN MALONEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RAMONA M. RATH (Defendant and Respondent)2RAMONA M. RATH (Defendant and Respondent) Disposition Oct 7 1968Opinion: Reversed

Granado v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. , 69 Cal.2d 399 [S. F. No. 22599. In Bank. Oct. 4, 1968.] HENRY GRANADO, Petitioner, v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, HASLETT WAREHOUSE et al., Respondents. COUNSEL Marcus, Sherbourne & Rucka, Marcus & Bresnahan and N. Michael Rucka for Petitioner. Morgan, Beauzay & Hammer and Victor H. Beauzay as […]

McAllister v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. , 69 Cal.2d 408 Opinion Information Date:Citation:Category:Status: Fri, 10/04/196869 Cal.2d 408Review – Civil AppealOpinion issued Parties 1MYRTLE McALLISTER, Petitioner, v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Respondent)2MYRTLE McALLISTER (Petitioner)3WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Respondent) Disposition Oct 4 1968Opinion: […]

Meier v. Ross General Hospital , 69 Cal.2d 420 Opinion Information Date:Citation:Category:Status: Fri, 10/04/196869 Cal.2d 420Review – Criminal AppealOpinion issued Parties 1ERIKA MEIER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ROSS GENERAL HOSPITAL et al. (Defendants and Respondents)2ROSS GENERAL HOSPITAL et al. (Defendants and Respondents) Disposition Oct 4 1968Opinion: Reversed

Lundberg v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. , 69 Cal.2d 436 [S. F. No. 22612. In Bank. Oct. 4, 1968.] ERIK H. LUNDBERG, Petitioner, v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, F. S. HUYCK CONSTRUCTION CO. et al., Respondents. COUNSEL Levy, DeRoy, Geffner & Van Bourg and Gerald J. Tiernan for Petitioner. Everett A. Corten, Richard Swanson, Rupert […]

In re Gullatt , 69 Cal.2d 395 [Crim. No. 11919. In Bank. Oct. 3, 1968.] In re CLYDE R. GULLATT on Habeas Corpus. COUNSEL Clyde R. Gullatt, in pro. per., and Robert N. Beechinor, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Petitioner. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and […]

Le Febvre v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. , 69 Cal.2d 386 [S. F. No. 22602. In Bank. Oct. 3, 1968.] HELEN LE FEBVRE, Petitioner, v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND et al., Respondents. COUNSEL William T. Hays for Petitioner. Everett A. Corten, Richard Swanson, T. Groezinger, Loton Wells, G. K. Bogue and […]

In re Yutze , 69 Cal.2d 389 Opinion Information Date:Citation:Category:Status: Thu, 10/03/196869 Cal.2d 389Review – Criminal AppealOpinion issued Parties 1DANIEL JOHN YUTZE (Petitioner) Disposition Oct 3 1968Opinion: Reversed

Kugler v. Yocum , 69 Cal.2d 371 [L. A. No. 29549. In Bank. Oct. 1, 1968.] CAROL J. KUGLER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. NORMA YOCUM et al., Defendants and Appellants. COUNSEL Don D. Bercu, City Attorney, for Defendants and Appellants. Weinstein, Shelley & Proctor, Weinstein & Shelley and Robert C. Proctor, Jr., for […]

Bellus v. City of Eureka , 69 Cal.2d 336 [S. F. No. 22236. In Bank. Sept. 13, 1968.] LOID D. BELLUS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF EUREKA, Defendant and Appellant. COUNSEL Melvin S. Johnsen, City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant. Hill & Neville and Robert W. Hill for Plaintiffs and Respondents. OPINION […]