Category: 1975

White v. Davis , 13 Cal.3d 757 [L.A. No. 30348. Supreme Court of California. March 24, 1975.] HAYDEN V. WHITE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EDWARD M. DAVIS, as Chief of Police, etc., Defendant and Respondent In Bank. (Opinion by Tobriner, J., expressing the unanimous view of the court.) COUNSEL A. L. Wirin, Fred Okrand, John […]

People v. Jenkins , 13 Cal.3d 749 [Crim. No. 17733. Supreme Court of California. March 20, 1975.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANDREW JENKINS et al., Defendants and Appellants In Bank. (Opinion by Clark, J., expressing the unanimous view of the court.) COUNSEL Gary K. Olsen, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendants […]

Anderson v. Phillips , 13 Cal.3d 733 [S.F. No. 23244. Supreme Court of California. March 14, 1975.] CARL WEST ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. GEORGE W. PHILLIPS, JR., as Presiding Judge, etc., et al., Respondents; EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., as Governor, etc., Intervener In Bank. (Opinion by The Court. Separate dissenting opinion by Mosk, J.) COUNSEL Edwin […]

Zecher v. Cory , 13 Cal.3d 743 [S.F. No. 23249. Supreme Court of California. March 14, 1975.] MARILYN PESTARINO ZECHER, Petitioner, v. KENNETH CORY, as State Controller, et al., Respondents In Bank. (Opinion by The Court. Separate dissenting opinion by Mosk, J.) COUNSEL John M. Burnett and Charles B. Leib for Petitioner. Evelle J. Younger, […]

County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court , 13 Cal.3d 721 [L.A. No. 30369. Supreme Court of California. March 12, 1975.] COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; CAROLE BURROUGHS, Real Party in Interest In Bank. (Opinion by Tobriner, J., expressing the unanimous view of the […]

Mehl v. People ex rel. Dept. Pub. Wks. , 13 Cal.3d 710 [L.A. No. 30285. Supreme Court of California. March 11, 1975.] ROSS M. MEHL et al., Cross-complainants and Respondents, v. THE PEOPLE ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, Cross-defendant and Appellant In Bank. (Opinion by Mosk, J., expressing the unanimous view of the court.) […]

Magee v. State Bar , 13 Cal.3d 700 [L.A. No. 30311. Supreme Court of California. March 7, 1975.] FRANK J. MAGEE, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent In Bank. (Opinion by The Court.) [13 Cal.3d 701] COUNSEL Herman Isman for Petitioner. Herbert M. Rosenthal and Ronald W. Stovitz for Respondent. OPINION THE COURT […]

County of San Diego v. Miller , 13 Cal.3d 684 [L.A. No. 30371. Supreme Court of California. March 6, 1975.] COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOHN M. MILLER, Defendant and Appellant In Bank. (Opinion by Clark, J., expressing the unanimous view of the court.) [13 Cal.3d 685] COUNSEL James E. Miller, Crake, […]

In re Winn , 13 Cal.3d 694 [Crim. No. 18298. Supreme Court of California. March 6, 1975.] In re RAY L. WINN on Habeas Corpus In Bank. (Opinion by Wright, C. J., expressing the unanimous view of the court. [13 Cal.3d 695] COUNSEL Roderick P. Bushnell, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Petitioner. Evelle […]

Lucas v. Board of Education , 13 Cal.3d 674 [S.F. No. 23177. Supreme Court of California. March 5, 1975.] ROY ALLEN LUCAS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE FORT BRAGG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent In Bank. (Opinion by Mosk, J., with Wright, C. J., McComb, Tobriner, Sullivan and Clark, JJ., […]

People v. Cook , 13 Cal.3d 663 [Crim. No. 17900. Supreme Court of California. March 4, 1975.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSEPH ROBERT COOK et al., Defendants and Appellants In Bank. (Opinion by Wright, C. J., expressing the unanimous view of the court.) COUNSEL Keith C. Monroe, James D. Riddet, Lawton, Christensen, Fazio, […]

Wilson v. Superior Court , 13 Cal.3d 652 [L.A. No. 30316. Supreme Court of California. March 4, 1975.] OLIVER WENDELL WILSON et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; PHILIP E. WATSON, Real Party in Interest In Bank. (Opinion by Mosk, J., expressing the unanimous view of the court.) COUNSEL Freeman, […]

In re Lisa R. , 13 Cal.3d 636 [S.F. No. 23204. Supreme Court of California. March 3, 1975.] In re LISA R., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. SACRAMENTO COUNTY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, Petitioner and Respondent, v. VICTOR R., Objector and Appellant In Bank. (Opinion by Wright, C. J., expressing the unanimous view of […]

Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc. , 13 Cal.3d 622 [L.A. No. 30356. Supreme Court of California. February 28, 1975.] ROSSMOOR SANITATION, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PYLON, INC., Defendant and Appellant; UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant; INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Cross-defendant and Respondent In Bank. (Opinion by Mosk, J., […]

Bunnell v. Superior Court , 13 Cal.3d 592 [S.F. No. 23128. Supreme Court of California. February 27, 1975.] MACK VERNON BUNNELL, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest In Bank. (Opinion by Wright, C. J., with Tobriner, Mosk and Sullivan, JJ., and Burke, J., concurring. Separate […]

Benson v. State Bar , 13 Cal.3d 581 [L.A. No. 30274. Supreme Court of California. February 25, 1975.] FRED W. BENSON, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent In Bank. (Opinion by The Court.) [13 Cal.3d 582] COUNSEL Hitt, Murray & Caffray and Anthony Murray for Petitioner. Herbert M. Rosenthal and Ronald W. Stovitz […]

Tomlinson v. State Bar , 13 Cal.3d 567 [L.A. No. 30312. Supreme Court of California. February 24, 1975.] JOHN THOMAS TOMLINSON, JR., Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent In Bank. (Opinion by The Court.) [13 Cal.3d 568] COUNSEL Clarence S. Hunt and Gary D. Vestermark for Petitioner. Herbert M. Rosenthal and Arthur L. […]

People v. Williams , 13 Cal.3d 559 [Crim. No. 18028. Supreme Court of California. February 20, 1975.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LEOLA WILLIAMS, Defendant and Appellant In Bank. (Opinion by Clark, J., expressing the unanimous view of the court.) [13 Cal.3d 560] COUNSEL Ruth Ohanessian, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant […]

People v. Brisendine , 13 Cal.3d 528 [Crim. No. 16520. Supreme Court of California. February 20, 1975.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL CLAYTON BRISENDINE, Defendant and Appellant (In Bank. Opinion by Mosk, J., with Wright, C. J., Tobriner and Sullivan, JJ., concurring. Separate dissenting opinion by Burke, J., with McComb and Clark, JJ., […]

Brown v. Pitchess , 13 Cal.3d 518 [L.A. No. 30313. Supreme Court of California. February 19, 1975.] EDWARD BROWN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. PETER J. PITCHESS, as Sheriff, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants (In Bank. Opinion by Clark, J., expressing the unanimous view of the court.) [13 Cal.3d 519] COUNSEL John H. […]

Caldwell v. State Bar , 13 Cal.3d 488 [L.A. No. 30328. Supreme Court of California. February 14, 1975.] CONRAD C. CALDWELL, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent In bank. (Opinion by The Court.) COUNSEL Rabern B. Prante for Petitioner. Herbert M. Rosenthal and Ronald W. Stovitz for Respondent. [13 Cal.3d 491] OPINION THE […]

People v. Lines , 13 Cal.3d 500 [Crim. No. 17898. Supreme Court of California. February 14, 1975.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RICHARD LEE LINES, Defendant and Appellant In Bank. (Opinion by Sullivan, J., expressing the unanimous view of the court.) COUNSEL David E. Kenner, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and […]

  No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles , 13 Cal.3d 486 [L.A. No. 30268. Supreme Court of California. February 13, 1975.] NO OIL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents In bank. (Opinion by The Court.) COUNSEL Carlyle W. Hall, Jr., Brent N. Rushforth, […]

In re Distefano , 13 Cal.3d 476 [L.A. No. 30344. Supreme Court of California. February 11, 1975.] In re RICHARD DISTEFANO on Disbarment In bank. (Opinion by The Court.) [13 Cal.3d 477] COUNSEL Joe Ingber for Petitioner. Herbert M. Rosenthal and Ronald W. Stovitz for Respondent. [13 Cal.3d 478] OPINION THE COURT. This is a […]