People v. Markham (1989) 49 Cal.3d 63 , 260 Cal.Rptr. 273; 775 P.2d 1042

People v. Markham (1989) 49 Cal.3d 63 , 260 Cal.Rptr. 273; 775 P.2d 1042 [No. S009472. Supreme Court of California. July 24, 1989.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JEROME JOSEPH MARKHAM, Defendant and Appellant (Opinion by Eagleson, J., with Lucas, C.J., Panelli, Kaufman and Kennard, JJ., concurring. Separate concurring opinions by Mosk and Broussard, […]

Read More

People v. Superior Court (Lucero)

People v. Superior Court (Lucero) (1989) 49 Cal.3d 14 , 259 Cal.Rptr. 740; 774 P.2d 769 [No. S002438. Supreme Court of California. June 29, 1989.] THE PEOPLE, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; JOSE RONILLO ABOGADO LUCERO et al., Real Parties in Interest (Opinion by Lucas, C. J., with Panelli, Eagleson […]

Read More

In re Sixto

In re Sixto (1989) 48 Cal.3d 1247 , 259 Cal.Rptr. 491; 774 P.2d 164 [No. S005275. Supreme Court of California. June 26, 1989.] In re FELIPE EVANGELISTA SIXTO on Habeas Corpus (Opinion by Panelli, J., expressing the unanimous view of the court.) COUNSEL Louis S. Katz and Judith C. Rosen for Petitioner. John K. Van […]

Read More

People v. Bloom

People v. Bloom (1989) 48 Cal.3d 1194 , 259 Cal.Rptr. 669; 774 P.2d 698 [No. S004639. Crim. No. 23874. Supreme Court of California. June 26, 1989.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT M. BLOOM, JR., Defendant and Appellant [Crim. No. 25325. Supreme Court of California. June 26, 1989.] In re ROBERT M. BLOOM, JR., […]

Read More

People v. Hamilton

People v. Hamilton (1989) 48 Cal.3d 1142 , 259 Cal.Rptr. 701; 774 P.2d 730 [No. S004485. Supreme Court of California. June 26, 1989.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL ALLEN HAMILTON, Defendant and Appellant (Opinion by Eagleson, J., with Lucas, C. J., Panelli, Kaufman, JJ., and Arguelles, J., concurring. Mosk, J., concurred in the […]

Read More

People v. Bittaker

People v. Bittaker (1989) 48 Cal.3d 1046 , 259 Cal.Rptr. 630; 774 P.2d 659 [No. S004359. Supreme Court of California. June 22, 1989.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LAWRENCE SIGMOND BITTAKER, Defendant and Appellant (Opinion by Broussard, J., expressing the unanimous view of the court.) COUNSEL Richard Such, under appointment by the Supreme Court, […]

Read More

People v. Williams

People v. Williams (1989) 48 Cal.3d 1112 , 259 Cal.Rptr. 473; 774 P.2d 146 [No. S004450. Crim. No. 22630. Supreme Court of California. June 22, 1989.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KENNETH DERRELL WILLIAMS, Defendant and Appellant [Crim. No. 24736. Supreme Court of California. June 22, 1989.] In re KENNETH DERRELL WILLIAMS on Habeas […]

Read More

People v. Murtishaw

People v. Murtishaw (1989) 48 Cal.3d 1001 , 258 Cal.Rptr. 821; 773 P.2d 172 [No. S004521. Supreme Court of California. June 8, 1989.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID LESLIE MURTISHAW, Defendant and Appellant (Opinion by Eagleson, J., with Lucas, C.J., Panelli and Kaufman, JJ., concurring. Separate dissenting opinion by Broussard, J. Separate dissenting […]

Read More

Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp.

Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 973 , 258 Cal.Rptr. 592; 772 P.2d 1059 [No. S009325. Supreme Court of California. May 25, 1989.] ROBERT NEWMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EMERSON RADIO CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent (Opinion by Lucas, C.J., with Panelli and Eagleson, JJ., and Arguelles, J., concurring. Separate dissenting opinion by Broussard, […]

Read More

In re Otto

In re Otto (1989) 48 Cal.3d 970 , 258 Cal.Rptr. 383; 772 P.2d 558 [No. S007308. Supreme Court of California. May 24, 1989.] In re THOMAS ARMSTRONG OTTO, Jr., on Suspension (Opinion by The Court.) COUNSEL Thomas Armstrong Otto, Jr., in pro. per., for Petitioner. Diane C. Yu, Truitt A. Richey, Jr., Richard J. Zanassi […]

Read More

Van Sloten v. State Bar

Van Sloten v. State Bar (1989) 48 Cal.3d 921 , 258 Cal.Rptr. 235; 771 P.2d 1323 [No. S006864. Supreme Court of California. May 15, 1989.] RICHARD ROSS VAN SLOTEN, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent (Opinion by The Court.) COUNSEL Richard Ross Van Sloten, in pro. per., for Petitioner. Diane C. Yu, Truitt […]

Read More

People v. Sheldon

People v. Sheldon (1989) 48 Cal.3d 935 , 258 Cal.Rptr. 242; 771 P.2d 1330 [No. S004704. Supreme Court of California. May 15, 1989.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JEFFREY THEODORE SHELDON, Defendant and Appellant (Opinion by Lucas, C. J., with Panelli, Eagleson, Kaufman, and Kennard, JJ., concurring. Separate concurring and dissenting opinion by Mosk, […]

Read More

People v. Allison

People v. Allison (1989) 48 Cal.3d 879 , 258 Cal.Rptr. 208; 771 P.2d 1294 [No. S004649. Supreme Court of California. May 11, 1989.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WATSON ALLISON, Defendant and Appellant (Opinion by Eagleson, J., with Lucas, C. J., Panelli and Kaufman, JJ., and Arguelles, J.,* concurring. Separate concurring opinion by Kaufman, […]

Read More

People v. Burton

People v. Burton (1989) 48 Cal.3d 843 , 258 Cal.Rptr. 184; 771 P.2d 1270 [No. S004691. Supreme Court of California. May 8, 1989.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANDRE BURTON, Defendant and Appellant (Opinion by Panelli, J., with Lucas, C.J., Eagleson, J., and Arguelles, J.,* concurring. Separate concurring and dissenting opinion by Broussard, J., […]

Read More

Calfarm Ins. Co. v. Deukmejian

Calfarm Ins. Co. v. Deukmejian (1989) 48 Cal.3d 805 , 258 Cal.Rptr. 161; 771 P.2d 1247] [No. S007838. Supreme Court of California. May 4, 1989.] CALFARM INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, as Governor, etc., et al., Respondents; ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOUNDATION et al., Real Parties in Interest; AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURANCE […]

Read More

People v. Bonillas

People v. Bonillas (1989) 48 Cal.3d 757 , 257 Cal.Rptr. 895; 771 P.2d 844 [No. S004525. Supreme Court of California. May 1, 1989.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LOUIS LUJAN BONILLAS, Defendant and Appellant (Opinion by Kaufman, J., with Lucas, C. J., Mosk, Broussard, Panelli and Eagleson, JJ., concurring. Separate concurring opinion by Arguelles, […]

Read More

Hitchcock v. State Bar (1989) 48 Cal.3d 690 , 257 Cal.Rptr. 696; 771 P.2d 394

Hitchcock v. State Bar (1989) 48 Cal.3d 690 , 257 Cal.Rptr. 696; 771 P.2d 394 [No. S003169. Supreme Court of California. April 27, 1989.] WILLIAM CONLEY HITCHCOCK, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent (Opinion by The Court.) COUNSEL William Conley Hitchcock, in pro. per., and Jeffrey M. Howard for Petitioner. Herbert M. Rosenthal, […]

Read More