Diethelm v. Rainey

Diethelm v. Rainey , 1 Cal.2d 245 [S. F. No. 15098. In Bank. July 5, 1934.] ULRICH DIETHELM, Respondent, v. EDWARD RAINEY, as Superintendent, etc., Appellant. COUNSEL Sullivan, Roche, Johnson & Barry for Appellant. Williamson & Wallace for Respondent. Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Alfred Sutro, Eugene M. Prince and A. B. Tanner, as Amici Curiae […]

Read More